The library that hands each creator back their own best openings
A social-first creator agency under 20 people had one strategist writing every brief for about 40 creators from memory, and the client asked for AI that nobody in the shop could scope.
Creator briefs written for the brand, not each creator's winning style
A contract check runs first, then a rule-based tagger builds one pattern library per creator from the exports they supply, ranked against their own median. A generator drafts concepts citing only that creator's own posts. The strategist edits and releases each brief, and a disclosure and claims check blocks anything non-compliant.
- all 42 concept lines across 4 briefs cite the same creator's own posts: 98 citations, 0 to another creator, by construction and checked by the run
- the creator without the analysis clause was refused with 0 of his files opened
- Rule-based tagger
- Template brief generator
- Per-creator pattern library
- Consent gate
- Citation audit
- Disclosure and claims check
- Strategist approval queue
Same problem?Send it over.
Tell me what your version looks like and which tools it runs in. I reply with how I would build it.
-
Health communications
The brief that knows where to look first
9 of 9 brief fields carry provenance, and all 66 citations were re-read from disk and verified with 0 failures
-
Design studio
The brand system that moved into the client's ChatGPT
admin time tracking down assets went from just under 20 hours a week to an hour or two
-
Marketing agency
The clip desk that reads its own drop-off
the desk pinned 6 of 6 drops to a transcript line and an export row; against the drops we designed into the curves ourselves, it found 6 of 6 and 0 of 1 decoy dips fired